Brit's antics cost Jamie Lynn custody

In a shocking move that is sure to set legal precedent, a Los Angeles court has denied sixteen-year-old Jamie Lynn Spears custody of the fetus that she has been carrying.

In addition, the court ruled that beginning immediately Spears would not receive any visitation rights to the still forming child.

“This is a precautionary move,” announced Court Commissioner Rod Norton. “This is based mainly on the suspect parenting skills that have been displayed by Ms. Spears' older sister Britney.”

Jamie Lynn has often been quoted as saying Britney is her role model, and that she hopes to follow in her footsteps. This concerned the court, which hopes to avoid the problems that have plagued the family of the elder Spears sister.

“We simply cannot stand back in good conscience and allow Jamie Lynn to have anything to do with this child,” stated Norton. “Her young nephews may already be irreparably damaged. It is of the utmost importance that we extract that fetus as soon as possible, and embed it into a more suitable woman. I'm not entirely sure that this is possible, but we have our finest scientists working on it as we speak.”

Once the child is born, custody is expected to be awarded to Spears' former brother-in-law Kevin Federline. While Federline has no biological link to the fetus, he has been determined to be the most stable influence in Jamie Lynn's life.

Jamie Lynn, the younger sister of troubled pop singer Britney Spears, announced in December that she was expecting a child with boyfriend Casey Aldridge. Shortly afterwards, her television show, “Zoey 101,” was cancelled by Nickelodeon.

A spokesperson for Nickelodeon stated that “while Nickelodeon and it's parent company MTV have always enjoyed a positive working relationship with Jamie Lynn Spears, we feel that showcasing a pregnant teenager on a show targeting the 9-14 age demographic is not a path that we wish to embark on at this time. I mean we can't be havin' a bunch of pregnant teenage bitches runnin' around our shows.”

Disclaimer: Stories printed in the Fanshawe Distorter are in fact fictious. Any resemblance to persons real or dead is intentional and entirely hilarious. Proudly distorting the truth since 2005.